It has been a relatively placid time when my inner attention wheel points vaguely at the rest of the world, what with the departure from the scene of the apoplexy – inducer in chief, GW Bush and his marauding sidekick Rumsfeld, who probably invades his own house each evening.
Settling under the broad Obama beam, there has been relatively little to instantly flick the weather vane to extremes. Though that said, the same’s not true of domestic politics stateside, where everyone seems to be losing their collective handle and bawling at all and sundry. There’s an interesting article on Clive Crook’s blog (http://blogs.ft.com/crookblog/2009/10/an-american-polity-blinded-by-rage/) in which he draws some fairly stark conclusions from the ongoing imbroglio over healthcare.
Nonetheless, the recent shenanigans at the climate change conference have also begun to fray at the mind of the muzzled inner mongrel, and it’s pretty disappointing to hear that the US is wanting to create whole new frameworks before it’ll engage with the emissions reductions process from Kyoto. I will try harder to find the article with the appropriate references, think it was in the Guardian. Anyway, it was a shadow of the way the US has often sought to engage with the world – on its’ terms or not at all.
Mind you, China are being equally unequivocal from the other side of the coin, and it’ll be interesting to see how their foreign policy develops as their influence broadens, given their internal mechanisms are still pretty heavy handed in their method of control.
There’s a bigger deal here in relation to how the UN institutions work, and how undemocratic some of the structures – in particular the security council – are. It’s pretty difficult to see a way of real progress with exclusive clubs of rich countries defining the terms for the rest, and this latest antagonism over emissions is in a similar vein. Interesting articles were raising how the Kyoto was flawed but nonetheless represented a framework for action which should be strengthened rather than scrapped altogether.
This is to be continued, but I thought the correlation was fairly apt, given the history of US engagement with the UN, even though in general it appears to be improving.
Hopefully this is a blip rather than a sign of things to come.